SpeedCrunch 1.1

(speedcrunch.org)

51 points | by LordNibbler 4 hours ago

7 comments

  • unanimous 1 hour ago
    This is nice to see, and it looks like this release (and maybe some earlier ones?) includes a small order of operations bug fix that hadn't been released for a long time. 1/2(-9.8) now equals -4.9 rather than -0.05102040816326530612. I like how the expression also renders with a multiplication symbol to clarify: 1 / 2 × (−9.8)
    • dataflow 54 minutes ago
      > 1/2(-9.8) now equals -4.9 rather than -0.05102040816326530612

      That should really be an error.

  • dang 1 hour ago
    Related:

    SpeedCrunch - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29661485 - Dec 2021 (131 comments)

    Speedcrunch (calculator) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=460520 - Feb 2009 (2 comments)

  • jiehong 2 hours ago
    List of changes for this calculator [0].

    I used to use it quite a bit, but I now gravitate towards numbat instead [1].

    [0]: https://www.speedcrunch.org/download.html

    [1]: https://github.com/sharkdp/numbat

  • borner791 1 hour ago
    Amazing! This is the most useful calculator.. bit shifts..radix conversations...

    I've been using it for years after struggling missing the windows 2000 calculator.

  • smusamashah 1 hour ago
    I recently opened a github issue about the system UI looking dark. I got a response an hour later which appears to be AI written, I responded to it and it looks like my request has been accepted.

    I absolutely do not mind it being AI driven. I have not seen this before in this. The response was not slop, just very formal and verbose.

    I use speed crunch almost every day mostly to see bits and bit shift operations visually. It's just strange to see requesting feature, getting an automated further inquiry, and then a response that yeah that sounds good to do.

  • hypercube33 30 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • amelius 1 hour ago
    I also recently made a fairly complete scientific calculator. I first asked Claude what functions it would put in it, then I made some modifications (added complex numbers), and told it to write the calculator. It looked perfect in one shot. This is really how simple this kind of thing has become.
    • girvo 41 minutes ago
      Scientific calculators are surprisingly hard to get right. SpeedCrunch itself just fixed some calculation errors (usually its order of operations based, but not always). I’d be interested to see how accurate yours is, though I also wonder if there are lower level libraries to leverage to make it a moot point