31 comments

  • Alien1Being 21 minutes ago
    Because keeping your national gold reserves in a Mafia state run by a arbitrary kleptocratic elite is a very bad idea.

    At this point international trust in the USA is at around the same level as trust in Iran and Russia .

    China handily beats the USA in the trust rankings in most of the world.

    • kristopolous 13 minutes ago
      and it's going to be like that for decades unless in like november there's a broad sweep of offices and the other party actually exercises power for once and prosecutes politicians criminal behavior instead of that infuriating clemency nonsense they always do.

      I'm betting they'll get elected and then sit on their hands as hard as possible calling it a "return to normalcy", fight their constituency, insist on doing absolutely nothing, and then get kicked right back out 2 years later and whine about people not voting for them.

      • mzhaase 9 minutes ago
        As a European, that would change nothing for me. The issue is systemic disinformation, fundamental lack of empathy and all those echo chambers. As long as this exists, the current situation will repeat or get worse.
      • mdp2021 8 minutes ago
        > november

        Have the Dem restored "appealing" and leadership?

        • lyu07282 4 minutes ago
          The DSA is pretty much the only hope democrats have left to restore any amount of credibility and they are fought by pretty much everybody right now.
  • cc62cf4a4f20 1 hour ago
    Because America can’t be trusted.
    • eastbound 48 minutes ago
      Yes.

      Also to note, why was the US trusted before? I think it's a heritage from the Marshall plan: The US saved us twice from Germany, therefore we owe them our nations and storing our gold there won't change much. A century later, it does.

      I'd rephrase the question as: Would you trust your parents? In childhood years probably, because you owe them your education anyway.

      • deepsun 40 minutes ago
        And because of the very convenient geographical location USA is unlikely to be invaded. You'd want your gold to be safe.
      • kergonath 8 minutes ago
        > Also to note, why was the US trusted before?

        Trust was never absolute. What we trusted was that the US would act rationally to further their interests. The US benefited tremendously from economic development across the world (industrialisation, free trade, rebuilding after the wars, etc). Sometimes the US government miscalculated (like in Iraq), but there was nothing really destructive like what Trump is doing.

        Even when we disagreed we could still talk things through and agree on other things. Now, you have Trump insulting allies and praising ennemies every day. Of course there is no trust.

      • rjzzleep 40 minutes ago
        I think you should look up the Morgenthau plan and look at the state of Germany today. Of course people will say that it's all because of Germany's own decisions. To which I would counter that Germany doesn't any sovereign decisions and the last time it did that was in 2011.
      • lovich 38 minutes ago
        I mean, we were trusted but also not fully.

        This isnt the first time European powers repatriated gold from the US. In 1971 France sent their navy to take their gold back because of another conservative US leader who decided to try and leverage our power at the expense of international trust and lost us a portion of said power[1].

        I am an American. I preferred when we were stronger because we sweetened the deal enough with everyone else that they let us be world financier/police/anti piracy force/etc.

        This fucking machismo theory taking over the older conservatives and the "The Torment Nexus was actually an awesome idea" taking over the tech bros and younger conservatives is fucking destroying us. Both groups seem incapable of believing in a win/win deal. Its also zero sum game to these fuckers and thus our soft power, and eventually our hard power, is being lost.

        [1]https://www.helleniscope.com/2025/07/31/august-1971-the-day-...

        • ElProlactin 33 minutes ago
          It's not really "eventually" for our hard power.

          Iran has exposed many limitations and weaknesses in America's defense capabilities, and it's a fraction of the threat China is.

          We have 0 carrier strike groups in the Indo-Pacific right now.

          • wood_spirit 15 minutes ago
            Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan all also exposed the weakness of American might? Was the last big war that the US won WW2?
            • kergonath 2 minutes ago
              The US lost these wars politically. This has always been the US weakness rather than pure military power.

              The US was better at getting what they wanted through either soft power or threat of military action than as a result of actual intervention. Which is why it’s really counterproductive when the government does not believe in soft power anymore. It’s the one thing you did well and that allowed you to get your way most of the time.

            • jfengel 7 minutes ago
              America won Iraq and Afghanistan in a walk.

              They didn't do a great job of nation building afterwards, but the actual war part was very successful.

          • lovich 25 minutes ago
            I think its eventually in that if we put our might behind it we could take probably any 2-3 major military powers on the planet at the current moment, but that's with the caveat that putting our might behind it means tens to hundreds of thousands of dead military members which we as a nation have lost the stomach for.

            I am saying eventually in that I think we will not even be able to do that if we found our grit again in the coming years as long as we are prioritizing raising testosterone in individual soldiers and removing qualified women and minorities from our military over having competent leaders and prioritizing logistics.

            • ElProlactin 19 minutes ago
              Sorry, the ship has already sailed.

              1. In Iran alone, the US has depleted stocks of some of its most advanced and important weapons systems.

              2. The US does not have the manufacturing capacity for an extended conflict (China does) and the US is in fact dependent on Chinese components and raw materials.

              3. As it relates to a China contingency in the Taiwan Strait: the Strait is ~140 miles at its widest point, and the Chinese have spent 20+ years investing in A2/AD capabilities. Given the state of the US military right now, it's hard to see how the US could overcome China's geographic advantage.

              4. Our most important allies don't trust us (and we're even threatening some of them) so don't expect them to help.

              5. Some of the most experienced and competent military leaders have been pushed out by an unqualified alcoholic who is more interested in how many pushups the cannon fodder can do than he is in how many ships America can build.

  • raffraffraff 11 minutes ago
    I suppose it could turn very bearish in the next few years?

    Something always occurs to me whenever I think about climate change. I think, "What is prosperity?" and the answers are mainly centered on stability and security. Not "stock market" stability, or "national security" but...

    Weather stability (floods, droughts, severe storms that lead to crop loss or yield reduction, wildfires, power outages and destruction).

    Food and energy security (crop loss or low yields leading to scarcity, food / gas / electric price increases etc)

    When I think about my family I think: first priority is to guarantee shelter, food and basic comforts. Everything after that is important of course, but without those three things, it all tastes like ashes. I can't pretend to be happy without stability.

    We can pretend that AI and GoogleAds are a great way to measure "prosperity" but in reality, if there's a threat to the basics, we can't pretend to be prosperous. "Value" can be destroyed very quickly when the foundations are gone.

    I don't have any more detail than that. I'm a lowly infrastructure engineer. I don't go any deeper than those shower thoughts.

    But is Europe looking at the state of the world and pulling it's reserves closer-to?

  • grey-area 1 hour ago
    The end of the US hegemony and the unstable regime in the US makes decoupling the best strategy.
    • mdp2021 12 minutes ago
      > unstable

      Well. Not sure. Untrustable system, maybe. (The whole chain that brought to this stage is improper - and the damaging factors are still active.)

    • kulahan 23 minutes ago
      Does anyone in power anywhere actually think China has finally overtaken the US hegemony? Or are we pretending someone else might somehow hold that position?
      • grey-area 17 minutes ago
        The end of hegemony isn’t usually immediately followed by the appointment of a new leader, usually it means fragmented power and war.

        Yes, China is a likely eventual successor and in some parts is the world has replaced the US in being the influential superpower.

      • bergen 19 minutes ago
        China is making trade deals and integration left and right and even Canada and Mexico are looking in other directions and cooperate more closely with china and eu. Maybe not a single power has to hold power
  • oleg_antonyan 25 minutes ago
    Russia had assets in Europe, look what happened to those. We got so naive and relaxed in the abscense of big wars within the "western hemisphere" that some people geniunly forgot what will happen to all of their "assets" when shit hit the fan.
    • baxtr 23 minutes ago
      I really wonder why. Something must have happened
      • mdp2021 14 minutes ago
        Not relevant to the point - "I gave my item to my former friend Paul". For some reason or for some other, it happens.

        And miscalculations in game theory happen ("he wouldn't, given...").

        • speedgoose 11 minutes ago
          I put my gold in the safe of my best friend, he has a good safe. Then I rapped and killed his wife and children, and destroyed his house. But he doesn’t want to give me the gold back.
          • momocowcow 1 minute ago
            ok, but russia and the west were never best friends, just some russians have major crushes on western europe and would still trust the europeans to hold their gold more than their own russian compatriots :))
          • mdp2021 3 minutes ago
            You are doing the complexity of history, and the due diligence of objective assessment and focus, a great disservice with those gross similes.

            Let us stick to a fitting analysis for the point of the limited trust entities can give each other, and let us stick to actual events for what the crimes committed are concerned (for the respect due).

      • oleg_antonyan 5 minutes ago
        Case in point: a naive belief in "high moral". Bad guy (Ru) attacks good guy - bad, punish, cancel. When good guy (US) attacks bad guy - that's different, whataboutism etc. Such POV falls apart when good guy (US) attacks another good guy (EU), and while you may chose to ignore such possibility, European leaders don't (a rare case of competence on their side).
  • thelastgallon 4 minutes ago
    Any country that keeps gold in US or dollar reserves may end up looking very foolish. Sanctions and asset (financial and real) forfeitures coming soon to a country near you.
  • helsinkiandrew 1 hour ago
    Good opportunity to post Periodic Videos tour of a Bank of England vault:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTtf5s2HFkA

  • noduerme 23 minutes ago
    Most of the major Bitcoin spikes and leveling-up of the price since 2012 have preceded or corresponded with governments tightening controls, and people using BTC they owned or buying it to evacuate capital to more lightly regulated countries. That's also why there hasn't been a Bitcoin rush for awhile, imho... it's no longer very useful for that, now that all the entrance and exit nodes are monitored. Gold is a bit hard to move, but this article may be underselling to what extent the recent spike in gold prices is attributable to demand for that kind of liquidity. The cross-border, anonymous kind.

    The demise of Localbitcoins actual local meetups and trading for cash was the end of a significant way to move money out of regimes that people suspected were going to take it from them.

    • csomar 21 minutes ago
      Localbitcoin is dead but there are still venues to trade bitcoin/crypto for cash. They have mostly moved to p2p on facebook and discord.
      • fedpost 7 minutes ago
        There are a few platforms that facilitate personal transactions using stuff like Venmo and Zelle but I suspect most of the people who are continuously selling lots of coins are probably silk road type vendors so I have to imagine it's just a great way to get your Venmo account on the feds radar.
  • momocowcow 8 minutes ago
    Individuals can do the same. Sell gold ETF and buy coin/bullion. The cost of holding physical is lessened if held for +10 years.
  • aurareturn 36 minutes ago
    If there is ever a conflict, US will seize assets of whatever country it is fighting with.
    • cbg0 18 minutes ago
      Sure, and you can replace US with almost any country in that sentence. The problem right now is there's a feeling that even decades-old alliances are no longer something you can count on when you're talking about the US.
      • Terr_ 7 minutes ago
        Even on a less-than-war level, nobody wants wants their own national assets to be held-hostage or used for extortion, when this Republican administration next demands a "favor" or kowtowing humiliation for some perceived slight.
    • cheema33 7 minutes ago
      > If there is ever a conflict, US will seize assets of whatever country..

      Canadians, and the rest of the world is finding out that you don't even need a conflict for US to lay claim over your stuff. "We want it", is perfectly legitimate and legal reason for the taking.

  • johnnyApplePRNG 31 minutes ago
    Because North America is an obvious tire fire?

    We can't even keep fresh food on our shelves https://trends.google.com/explore?q=moldy%20food&date=all&ge...

    I have seen moldy produce all over the GTA here in Canada lately. The homeless situation in Hamilton Ontario is getting out of control.

    The province posted a billboard the other day around the corner of my house showing some woman "protecting her community against encampments" (aka homeless people).

    There are hoards of homeless people that live in the woods just around the corner of this billboard.

    It didn't last 3 days.

    Neither did the one they put up after it.

    Neither did the non-encampment-scare-mongering-one they put up after it.

    The homeless or whoever kept destroying it visually with paint/etc.

    It advertises TSN sports now.

    And I live in a "nice part of town". East hamilton is another planet. Children stabbing children over bicycles. Children shooting random passerbys. [0] Etc. It's bad.

    [0] https://hamiltonpolice.on.ca/news/sarkodie-homicide-suspect-...

    • dyauspitr 19 minutes ago
      It’s a tire fire but not for the reasons you’re pointing out.
  • giov4 19 minutes ago
    more interesting question: When do countries change gold reserves locations and for which reasons? past examples?
  • grebc 1 hour ago
    The orange one. Duh.
    • dgellow 49 minutes ago
      He’s just one part of the explanation, it’s also all the people who are behind him. He’s mostly a front nowadays. If Trump is gone, things wouldn’t be better with Vance taking his place
      • selectodude 41 minutes ago
        It’s the voters that put him back. You could say it was an aberration the first time but the second? Americans are too stupid and selfish to be trusted with the immense power they were given.
        • hbarka 24 minutes ago
          “Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind in human beings at least a sense of unease. Against stupidity we are defenseless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed – in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical – and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for when dealing with a stupid person than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous.”

          - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison

    • AngryData 22 minutes ago
      I mean that is the biggest factor now, but also because most of the rest of our federal politicians are also worthless and corrupt.
      • fedpost 2 minutes ago
        He's the center of gravity who's enabling the decline at the moment. It's a rare case where doing the thing would probably result in less instability instead of more.
  • zdc1 46 minutes ago
    Well, why would European gold be stored in America in the first place?
    • nairboon 13 minutes ago
      It's a remnant of the cold war and the two preceding hot wars. The plan was to ship big parts of the gold overseas, just in case Europe gets nuked and occupied in a ground invasion from the east. But lately there have been more threats for an invasion from the west, so gold goes back.
    • itake 23 minutes ago
      Security: European have been taken over multiple times by Germany. Keeping the gold in the usa keeps the money a safe distance from the fight.
    • bigbaguette 44 minutes ago
      It's probably a matter of liquidity, storing it where it can be exchanged when needed. Transport is quite expensive
    • stackghost 17 minutes ago
      Gosh, have we in the West forgotten so much of our history already?

      Much of the gold was moved out of Europe prior to and during WWI. Partly out of fears of German aggression b ut also because throughout the war, European countries bought massive amounts of materiel from America, which increased the flow of money out of European and into American coffers.

      But gold itself is very heavy and thus cumbersome to transport. It doesn't make sense to run transatlantic gold shipments every time a few bars change hands. So central banks tended to keep the gold more or less in one big vault and just sort of move the bricks between one country's pile and another. So there would be, in essence, a large stack of gold in the US Federal Reserve, and that gold belonged to France, or whomever. When the war ended, European countries were devastated and needed goods from somewhere that didn't have depleted industrial capacity and whose farmlands weren't littered with UXO.

      This situation more or less cemented America's position as the world's creditor, and so it simply was more convenient to keep a large portion of one's gold reserves in the country with whom you were doing a lot of business.

      Now that Americans have decided they like being a military, economic, and cultural superpower less than they like electing a dementia-ridden child rapist, other countries have correctly realized that America's decline cannot be stopped, only slowed. After all, it's Americans themselves who are the root of the problem, and Trump is but a symptom. This instability is not going to stop when he leaves office. Better get your gold off the sinking ship, but do it slowly so as to not accelerate the sinking before you can get it all out.

      Re: the gold situation after WWI, if you're interested I encourage you to read Liaquat Ahamed's excellent Lords of Finance, which won the Pulitzer, IIRC.

  • ArtTimeInvestor 54 minutes ago
    The dangerous situation we are in is that entities outside of the USA hold significantly more US assets than US entities own assets outside the USA.

    So if the USA declares "ownership be damned", it would be a net win for the USA.

    Or in simpler terms: The USA has been giving out IOUs for real goods for decades. It is now tempting to default on those IOUs. The USA did this before. Up until 1971, a dollar certified a claim to gold. Then the USA simply canceled that promise.

    The current ramp up to AI dominance might be what holds the USA back from breaking more ties with the world. It is a race that must be won. And investments from abroad help. But when the whole world is operated by US AI factories things might look different. When every task around the world is performed by intelligence generated in the USA, just like every computer is run by US software now - there might be little incentive left to "pay the rent" for the rest of the world that now sits around idle, fiddling their thumbs.

    • ElProlactin 50 minutes ago
      > The dangerous situation we are in is that entities outside of the USA hold way more US assets than US entities own assets outside the USA.

      The dangerous situation we are in is that the US is berating and betraying its closest historical allies, eroding its credibility and soft power, and weakening its leverage at a time when threats to the Western order that has existed since the end of WW2 are growing rapidly.

      Incidentally, the orange man in charge loves to tout "deals" in which foreign countries agree to invest substantial sums in the US, so any actions that lead foreign countries to believe their investments might be nationalized banana republic-style won't help the administration's efforts to attract investment and onshoring.

    • AngryData 11 minutes ago
      If the US did something so economically hostile it would tank its own stock market just from the world cutting off a bunch of trade.
      • Terr_ 1 minute ago
        [delayed]
    • nairboon 32 minutes ago
      Well, they could, but the moment Donald defaults on those bonds, he can say goodbye to those stock market highs and watch new unprecedented lows.
    • nikitaga 51 minutes ago
      It's not going to be a net win for anyone. A country that needs to keep borrowing to stay afloat is not going to improve its position by effectively defaulting on its debt, regardless of the exact method or type of assets involved.
    • ai_critic 51 minutes ago
      "If you owe the bank a million, you have a problem; if you owe the bank a billion..." etc.

      And the US owes trillions.

      • toolslive 46 minutes ago
        yes. but most of it is not to other countries. Most government debt (over 80% globally) is privately owned through sovereign debt instruments like bonds.
        • wskinner 38 minutes ago
          And who owns the bonds?
          • dash2 31 minutes ago
            Private citizens and companies, as the gp said.
  • throw34521 23 minutes ago
    Dedollarisation next
  • wewewedxfgdf 48 minutes ago
    Lack of trust.
  • notorandit 39 minutes ago
    Because it is theirs?

    Would you keep your food or car in someone else's garage?

    • Erem 16 minutes ago
      Everyone here keeps their money in bank or brokerage accounts, because we trust the law to protect us if the bank accounts try to steal our stuff.

      We are seeing that foreign countries no longer believe the USA is still a nation of laws.

  • testing22321 1 hour ago
    I’d be really interested to see all European countries & Canada dump their US bonds en mass if trump does anything untoward in Greenland, Canada or elsewhere.
    • noduerme 43 minutes ago
      As an American trying to retain my sanity in this country, I have to tell myself that such things are just trollish nonsense from the ultimate reality television troll. It is comforting to me that 50% of what he says is bluster and the other 50% is pure fabrication. I think we have developed some resistance to it where, like, a few years ago we would say "OH MY GOD! HE CAN'T POSSIBLY BE THREATENING CANADA!" and now we're just like, "there goes crazy old man again, don't worry, he just shit his pants on the golf course".

      Not saying it's right or sound that he's the elected leader of the country or that our politics is so warped... I mean, I blame it on being on the losing end of the most rigorously fought information war in history.

      But I believe you can relax, because this is all nonsense.

      FWIW, the American people can't even support a war against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which has been blowing up our soldiers for decades. Hard to imagine they'd show much support for invading an ally.

      • wanderingpixel 21 minutes ago
        > But I believe you can relax, because this is all nonsense.

        Sorry, but no.

        Even if there are no kinetic attacks towards allies right now, the "crazy old man" is causing real harm. Harm to global stability and the world order, economies, to businesses and individuals, to long term initiatives such as research and healthcare. But most importantly, real harm to the trust between ourselves. Western allies can no longer trust the USA, it is broken, we no longer have the same values.

        The first time in 2016 we forgave, everyone makes mistakes and Europe is certainly not free of them. But the American people chose to elect him twice with full knowledge, now everyone suffers.

        So the rest of the world forges its own path now. America's military, economic and cultural hegemony will decline. Not tomorrow, maybe not even quickly, but inevitably. Godspeed !

        • noduerme 6 minutes ago
          Which is it... Godspeed the decline, or you hope it doesn't?

          I think it's a tragedy that America elected him twice, and it has already led to chaos among our allies and irreparable harm to the postwar order in which America was the seat of empire after Britain. I think that [the populist brain virus which took hold of America, in 2016 and particularly after covid] was done intentionally by Russia and China who are enemies of America. Is the loss of that order what you are bemoaning?

          We are also a country that established itself from European colonies. Every time Argentina or Brazil or Chile or Venezuela or Colombia go through spasms of communist or fascist takeover, Europe takes that as an unsurprising fact, and the bankers keep doing business with them. There is something much more frightening about America reaching some polar political extreme, and it's not simply nuclear weapons (because several very extreme dictatorships have those).

          What is scary about it is the same thing that's scary about the AfD in Germany... the idea that we are losing the generational knowledge we built to safeguard some of the world against savagery. In order to believe this, you must also believe that Germany and the US are not already, inherently savage and that some of the order brought by NATO and the postwar order has been a good thing, even up to and including the Cold War.

          Then, we can define what is worth saving about America and why it matters.

      • johanvts 13 minutes ago
        I bought that initially, but Trump is causing real harm. The abandonment of WHO and USAid programs, stepping out of the paris accords etc. etc.

        But the real issue is that he has been elected twice, it is not some one-off freak accident, a lot of americans just care more about transphobia or pizzagate than climate change or geopolitics and thats why its now clear to the rest of the world that we can’t trust the US any more.

      • noir_lord 16 minutes ago
        Except that “crazy old man” (I’d have gone with corrupt criminal malignant narcissist to be honest) isn’t just shouting at pigeons in the park he already screwed up the world economy by staring a war he can’t figure out how to exit and dozens of other things.

        When the pigeon shouter threatens to annex Canada/Greenland you can shrug it off, when the leader of the largest economy and military says it, you can’t.

        Words matter.

        I’m British, We are often regarded as one of the US’s closest allies, I’m fucking furious with Trump and the people who support him, I’ve been boycotting everything US made that I can and I essentially see the current US as a globally destabilising force.

        Are there decent Americans appalled by what they’ve become, sure, doesn’t make a difference to the outcome though either.

        Trump isn’t the main problem, he’s a symptom of the disease that is the main problem, the US elected him twice, that rot goes to the core.

      • stackghost 4 minutes ago
        >But I believe you can relax, because this is all nonsense.

        Wow you guys really don't get it, do you? It's not nonsense to us.

  • howcani 38 minutes ago
    Before asking "why", ask "if".
    • tgv 31 minutes ago
      That doesn't make sense to me. It's already happening.
  • j3th9n 26 minutes ago
    So far for "Russia will invade Europe". The USA seems a bigger threat.
  • ChrisArchitect 43 minutes ago
    Related:

    Norway's Oil Fund Proposes Selling Roughly $80B in U.S. Treasurys

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49564189

    Dutch central bank moves share of gold from U.S., Canada to London

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49535526

  • CamperBob2 1 hour ago
    Same reason they moved it out of Germany in 1930-1931?
    • stop50 26 minutes ago
      the pull out then was an reaction to the black friday.
    • notnaut 52 minutes ago
      Please don’t tell me this is just the beginning…..
      • cjfd 19 minutes ago
        Well, who knows? The trajectory has been set in and it is downwards. After Nero and the year of the four emperors the Roman Empire still had ways to go. So, I would say also the US can potentially recover. On the other hand the saying 'it cannot possibly get worse than this' has also been disproven may times in history. In any case, I like to sum it all up by saying "The US is a superpower attempting to become a third world country".
  • ChrisArchitect 32 minutes ago
  • dyauspitr 20 minutes ago
    Because Trump is tasked with ending American hegemony and Europe is getting ahead of that.
  • meindnoch 16 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • SadErn 32 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • aaron695 42 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • s5300 58 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • danavar 33 minutes ago
    Most people here are offering the pop-culture take that "US is bad"

    but I want to offer the counterfactual with my comment that the "EU is foolish"

    I'm pretty sure my take is right

    • cbg0 23 minutes ago
      Three EU countries versus some random on the Internet calling them "foolish", I'm pretty sure your take is bad.
    • gfrecvh 30 minutes ago
      Last time this happened, the us refused to give back the gold and then removed the peg to the gold, so I'm sure your take is ignorant.
    • gspr 15 minutes ago
      That must be why von der Leyen renamed the Mediterranean to Lake Europe recently.

      Give me a break. In the present situation, the US is a lunatic asylum on fire, and the EU is a regular ol' boring place with boring problems.

  • usern20260720 58 minutes ago
    If the European countries had wanted to be independent from the US, they would have adopted the gold standard for their currency
    • lovich 28 minutes ago
      lol, we(america) were the ones who fucked with the gold standard and had the system collapse due to lack of trust in the first place[1]

      Please explain your logic behind the idea that European countries needed to have adopted the gold standard that the US unilaterally changed the rules on, to be independent from the US.

      [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock

    • deely3 42 minutes ago
      Why? Honestly, how it will help?