Nice, this has a cute feel to it. I smiled about some of the gossip at the bottom. Tiny suggestions: make the space bar pause/unpause, and for my ears the background music could be way quieter compared to the sound effects - with the default settings I thought the game had no sound yet.
Will definitely play more in the evening!
Thanks for the feedback! If you hold the volume button it opens up sliders to adjust the music/ambient noise levels. I should make this more obvious, probably.
No it's fine, I had no trouble finding the sound settings! My remark was just about the defaults (and probably is more of an individual preference anyway)
Cute game! Very CPU-hungry (in Firefox on Linux), maybe you can get it a bit more optimized. There are some annoying AI-isms ("the X is the goal not the Y"-- just tell me the X please).
Is there a way to build anything on the ground floor, or is it just a big empty lobby? Feels like wasting a lot of space.
Not yet. There are fires, and a trained safety team (something you have to get funded and maintain) puts them out. SimTower didn't have crime either, so I didn't consider building that out.
...The earliest strong match located by QI appeared in 1955 within a periodical called “The Commonwealth: Official Journal of the Commonwealth Club of California”. The club is a non-profit public affairs organization. The quotation [by Major George Racey Jordan] appeared as a filler item.
This smells a bit closer to "We're capitalists, but we'd like to get some lift from the current socialist vibe". If that's the case, respect for skimming off the rubes.
If not, it's giving "We're tying ourselves up with the rope the capitalists sold us".
That cuts both ways - can people in the US vote for democratic socialism, or will the capitalists then create super PACs to influence elections, thus undermining the principle of one person, one vote?
So the socialists don't influence elections? they don't have speeches and advertising? News to me -- are you sure the majority want socialism? seems like many many people don't. Or is the election only "influenced" if it doesn't go your way?
I have no horse in that race as I don't live in the US. But reading today that in Michigan the democratic primary loser outspent the winner almost 10:1 truly baffled my mind. Stuff like this isn't even legal in most other democracies, i.e. in France all presidential candidates have to have equal TV time to present their respective positions.
Imagine how the political landscape in the US would look like if people's votes were actually equal.
This PAC influence being putatively for buying advertising, to you know influence individual voters to their point of view? They can’t literally buy votes.
So votes only matter if they’re not influenced by PACs? Perhaps it’s more that if a voter agrees with a capitalist PAC then it’s no longer a valid individual vote? It smacks of anti-democratic value that the masses are too dumb to vote correctly.
Of course they don't literally buy votes, but statistically they very much do. Stuff like not having votes only on sundays, votes taking hours, publicity just meaning outspending the opponent etc. are all things most other democracies don't have. I literally had a political science course in university were these were taught as cases of voter suppression (i.e. If you are a member of the working /middle /upper class, how likely is it that you can easily be off work for a full day on a tuesday, compared to a sunday?).
Highest score is calculated by the number of days you last before everyone goes hungry and destroys the wall built to prevent the citizens from escaping to a capitalist country.
There's this example of such a game: https://store.steampowered.com/app/784150/Workers__Resources...
Is there a way to build anything on the ground floor, or is it just a big empty lobby? Feels like wasting a lot of space.
As someone else said, the lobby is the lobby - eventually the Assembly starts to meet there once you make enough progress, but that is about it.
If not, it's giving "We're tying ourselves up with the rope the capitalists sold us".
I acknowledge the irony though.
From whom?
Can the people democratically decide they want capitalism instead?
Imagine how the political landscape in the US would look like if people's votes were actually equal.
This PAC influence being putatively for buying advertising, to you know influence individual voters to their point of view? They can’t literally buy votes.
So votes only matter if they’re not influenced by PACs? Perhaps it’s more that if a voter agrees with a capitalist PAC then it’s no longer a valid individual vote? It smacks of anti-democratic value that the masses are too dumb to vote correctly.
The whole modern democratic socialist movement as I understand it is primarily to fix exactly that issue.