I'm considering the same thing. I've done the "contact your MP" thing, but it's a waste of time. You just receive a pre-written letter from some minimum wage assistant (or maybe just a bot).
It's either that or I just consider the internet dead and move on. It's nothing like it was 20 years ago anyway. There are other things to do. Many books to read and places to go. We had something really cool and we were lucky to experience it while it lasted, but it's gone now.
> consider the internet dead and move on. It's nothing like it was 20 years ago anyway. There are other things to do. Many books to read and places to go. We had something really cool and we were lucky to experience it while it lasted, but it's gone now.
I'm pretty much at this stage too. The web/internet was a frontier like the Wild West. But those wild days are gone and are never coming back. Cyberspace has been settled.
The web is only a minuscule part of cyberspace. Once millions of people have an AI supercomputer running a graphical node at home in 3-10 years time, then cyberspace will finally start IMO. The web will look like a catalogue file in comparison.
It’s hard to feel any enthusiasm for democracy watching things you disagree with being pushed through and having no power to stop it. I signed the petition to reverse the OSA and all we got was a canned response.
I’ve come to the conclusion the only thing you can really do is leave when you disagree with the direction of your country, but of course not everyone has the ability to do that.
> We had something really cool and we were lucky to experience it while it lasted, but it's gone now.
You can also recreate a smaller network and enjoy it as a silo, disconnected from the Internet, at times.
There's no need to be off the grid 24/7 to feel the relief.
It's deeply relaxing to pull the (Internet) plug (I do, literally, physically remove one ethernet cable from a switch right underneath my monitor and I've then got several machines happily communicating only on the LAN: no more Internet).
Maybe I'm having fun with my latest acquisition: modelling parts to fix stuff left and right around the house by 3D printing them (I bought a 3D printer for that: I had many things I needed to fix and I knew I'd be able to fix them properly by printing adequate parts). No need for the Internet to model, slice and 3D print.
Such an activity does feel like the computing of yore: it takes me back to a time when it was me and a 8-bit machine. Creating stuff "by code" (which now take physical form at home, which 11-years old me would have find utterly mindboggling btw).
> There are other things to do. Many books to read and places to go.
And hobbies. As a kid from the eighties I love cars from the late 80s/very early 90s: not much electronics, not spying on you. Sure they're a bit of gaz guzzlers but then half the fun is fixing stuff on them and the other half is talking about them with other enthusiasts: there's no need to drive 10 000 kilometers a year with those.
When you take time to disconnect a bit from the Internet, then I'd say when you're online (like I'm now) it all feels way more tolerable.
I've set up a socks5 "proxy multiplexer" that routes requests to different upstream proxies based on the request hostname. For example reddit routes via a VPS in Dublin, and imgur routes via Tor. I believe socks5 is the ideal layer to do the multiplexing at, for web traffic, because the request hostnames are visible to the multiplexer even if ECH/ESNI is in use. It was a oneshot vibecoded solution but it's been pretty solid thus far, so maybe I should open-source it.
I wrap the outbound sock5 traffic in mTLS, so it should look "normal" to anyone packet sniffing (not obvious proxy/VPN traffic), even though stealthiness isn't part of the threat model at the moment.
There is no "Net" any more. There probably never was really. The internet protocols were designed for resilience from the start. A key to that is packet-switching over circuit-switching. But this thing we call the "internet" today? This thing where more and more nodes can't even speak directly to each other and nobody even cares (see IPv6)? This thing where 90% of traffic goes to a few large multinationals? It's not that. We have no resistance to censorship.
I’m already using policy based routing on UniFi to send OSA censored websites, imgur for example, via Mullvad VPN - it works for the most part, but for any IPv6 websites it completely breaks as UniFi doesn’t support policy based routes for IPv6.
If the government blocks Mullvad then I’ll just switch to Wireguard on a Helsinki based VPS via Hetzner.
The camp who think VPNs and Tor are a solution to government policies feel like disinformation at times.
VPNs are trivial to ban, the IP space is well known, Wireguard is easily to fingerprint and block.
It will be a cat and mouse game, if the government looses this they'll simply make it illegal to be caught using a VPN including Tor. Which is on the table.
The only way this changes is a less crap party, but almost all including Reform are in favour of more censorship.
Zia Yusuf : "... criticised sections of the legislation that allow ministers to direct regulator Ofcom to modify its rules setting out how companies can comply with requirements to crack down on illegal or harmful content, saying it was “the sort of thing that I think (Chinese president) Xi Jinping himself would blush at the concept of”."
Publishing under a throwaway account for obvious reasons.
I've felt this slide in the UK for a long period of time. I route _all_ of my traffic through Mullvad with DAITA [1] because I think it's the only the likes of chaffing and winnowing [2] that can defeat traffic analysis. The endpoint changes. I have a high-end SBC router. For the moment, I do not obsfucate the fact that the tunnels exist and are wireguard. Mullvad can disguise them effectively with QUIC / SNI obsfucation, or even vless / xray / vmess. They're quite good at that.
I also have an Amsterdam VPS and it runs wireguard. My phone has a wireguard client to it. It's a reputable VPS provider from a major cloud hosting company. It has a reverse WG tunnel to my house not through mullvad (I have a public IPv6 address range, but not IPv4); my phone (and partner, friends etc phones) get access to my local servers and resources and then all traffic goes out anonymously through mullvad. I also have another VPS, paid for in cryptocurrency (XMR) that I mine in the winter (the waste heat is cheaper than gas heating where I live, if you assume the compute is paid for...). This acts as a port forwarding host and it connects via another WG tunnel or two to my server, doing tunnel-in-tunnel, but essentially is a reverse proxy host.
I naturally run a recursive resolver _and_ dnscrypt on the ISP connection for bootstrapping.
This gives me _some_ degree of anonymity, I feel, online: I've inspected the traffic going through the ISP router and you see remarkably little, especially with QUIC SNI spoofing turned on. The volume of traffic is quite large and probably idiosyncratic – the endpoints are known – which is the biggest problem amongst all of this. But I have _privacy_ and for me that matters a lot.
I think this age verification, KYC, show your faces stuff is organised internationally on two very simple predicates:
1) Disinformation or political interference provided by Russia and possibly China have affected national election results in many democracies (Brexit, likely Trump, probably more). Controlling the narrative is increasingly viewed as absolutely required by the political class. This is difficult with social media, and strong identity verification makes it more obvious where at least your enemies are.
2) Online actions are increasingly having real world consequences and the establishment wants to be able to more easily _punish_ those people who have broken "the law". This is related to, but distinct from, point 1. There are plenty of examples of this in the UK – but more widely spread worldwide. Having strong identity verification makes it easy to catch people, and if you do that enough, change behaviour (the single biggest determinant of which is shortening the time between "offending" and being caught).
Minor points I think behind this are:
1) A fear of a large-scale war and worries about information security, population influence, and associated military shadowy figures saying things
2) A fear (or fact) of encryption making any sort of content dragnet much harder. Most large web presences undoubtedly have backdoors but genuine p2p without exposed metadata is a fear of the spook community because they kill people on the basis of metadata and machine learning state-of-the-art...as it was in 2014 [3] -- I am sure they do the same now. The reason for metadata is that it is accessible, by design, everywhere. VPN ± tor usage is probably ubiquitous amongst some genuinely bad actors, and they will have spent considerable resources being able to unmask those actors. Depending on the technique, it may genuinely make it much harder if there is a large fraction of the population actually using those tools.
3) Some genuine transnational rise in avoidable harm, like CSAM; some genuine transnational rise in political harms, like the (oft-religious) right.
> And so, for the first time, I am considering locating something (perhaps a WireGuard node, or a SOCKS proxy, or a recursive DNS server / DNS proxy, or perhaps all of them) somewhere on the Internet outside the UK, so that I can route some traffic through that, as needed, to maintain my access to the web.
Good luck, it will probably impossible as admins fed up with AI scraper bots increasingly choose to outright blanket ban anything not being a residential or business line. There's a reason why there are so many "ethically sourced proxies" aka people installing software on their smart TVs and whatnot that comes with an "monetization SDK" by one of the numerous VPN providers. That's the dirty secret behind a lot of the "bypass youtube/netflix/whatever region lock" VPNs.
> In the name of “online safety”, the fundamental rights of both freedom of expression and privacy appear to be under imminent threat.
The current UK government don't actually care about children, if they did then they would actually investigate the child SA gangs, or holding people to account on the Epstein lists. We have seen other countries such as Australia [1] "magically" have the same idea at the same time, so this is likely a global group influencing this push.
> The current proposal to ban people under 16 - who also have the rights to freedom of expression and privacy - from some (as yet not fully delineated) social media services is likely to result in wide-spread verification.
This is the real objective, it will be just like the UK porn verification [2]. To express yourself online, you will soon need to associate your activity with your real identity. With the discussion of clamping down on VPNs, it won't be long before you need to verify your ID just to connect to the internet.
This has been a long time coming. Years ago you could buy a sim card with money already on it, use it, and then throw it away. Now you need to associate some credit card or ID with the sim card and perform some verification process.
> And so, for the first time, I am considering locating something (perhaps a WireGuard node, or a SOCKS proxy, or a recursive DNS server / DNS proxy, or perhaps all of them) somewhere on the Internet outside the UK, so that I can route some traffic through that, as needed, to maintain my access to the web.
It won't be enough. At some point the UK government will just mandate that they should be allowed to perform deep packet inspection, and then there will be nowhere left to hide. These changes are also being rolled out everywhere - which Country do you trust to run your data through?
I remember the New Zealand Christchurch attack on a mosque, and how multiple governments around the world pressured Facebook to remove it entirely [3]. They were more worried about people seeing and sharing the attack, than the attack itself. The manifesto was entirely banned [4], and people were left entirely dependent on the state to convey a narrative about the attack.
I have a feeling that this all fell out of the "Christchurch Call" [5]. I don't think this recent push spearheaded by them, but I believe it had a large influence on the efforts now ongoing.
I agree with everything you have said. I feel so very, very blessed to have had the experience of this world developing that I have had - from my first 300bps BBS connection at probably around age 8 or 9, through 28.8, 56K, ISDN, DSL & up to the gigabit fibre I type this from, I have always from basically from day 1 communicated with other people over a network. It's almost as intrinsic to my being as actual speech at this point. Maybe even more so on many days. But where we are now and headed to, is just so very, very wrong. It's so wrong it shouldn't even need explanation.
I've seen and experienced all manner of things the state would deem verboten, especially for younger eyes, whether it be the anarchists cookbook sparking my enthusiasm for chemistry and engineering, warez igniting my love of software development or the inescapable porn, memes, and other shit that's filled my screen for decade after decade.
I've managed to make it through unscathed, dare I say even somewhat publicly respectable... I'd vote for my kids and any others having my childhood over the toxic stazi-esque nightmare we seem to currently find ourselves in. I LOVED my childhood growing up with the internet, CD-R's, Napster, etc. it inspired me & helped create the life I live today, but now all the kids using tech just look like methed out zombies.
It's also really funny reflecting on this & realising how very little I ever used or valued anything like Facebook, Instagram, etc. whereas things like BBS's, IRC, Discord, Telegram, etc. with random strangers and some shared interests is where I've always felt at home.
So many of the outrageous things the UK government is doing, which seem most inexplicable, can be explained by one simple principle - successive governments over the last 30 years have turned this nation into a tinderbox, the purpose of the state and the judiciary in particular has become singular in its effort to prevent a spark from igniting the whole thing. Though they will become ever more authoritarian and tyrannical in their efforts, defenders dilemma applies - eventually, inevitably, they will fail and all hell will break loose. Plan accordingly.
"who also have the rights to freedom of expression and privacy", plenty of outlets for people to be expressive in the UK (more so than in the US for example, where the right wing will obviously attack any social media restrictions) that don't involve being fed junk divisive content from mainly US tech companies.
Privacy != anonymity.
Feel free to route your traffic via Wireguard. As long as it is not setup as a service for the mass evasion of age gates by children.
Nice try ! But the fact that the solution to protecting children comes with the maximum boost of government powers in the online world (across the set of all possible ways to protect children) is not a coincidence.
Exactly. You can have your own misgivings about the UK government at home, in private, and share them with no-one. Or you can share them on the online public square, knowing the UK government will know exactly who wrote them. Good thing they never abuse their power of prosecution!
> It is done by the CPS, which operates independently of government and the police.
I should have written "state", not "government", you're right. Does that change anything? But, article 35 of the Chinese constitution guarantees their citizens freedom of speech and of the press. You're beyond naive if you believe they're independent.
> If I were a betting man I'd place a bet that you are further misinformed about the prosecutions you believe are happening and why.
UK politicians admitted the Online Safety Act was: “not primarily aimed at … the protection of children”, but was about regulating “services that have a significant influence over public discourse” - https://archive.md/2025.08.13-190800/https://www.thetimes.co...
It's either that or I just consider the internet dead and move on. It's nothing like it was 20 years ago anyway. There are other things to do. Many books to read and places to go. We had something really cool and we were lucky to experience it while it lasted, but it's gone now.
I'm pretty much at this stage too. The web/internet was a frontier like the Wild West. But those wild days are gone and are never coming back. Cyberspace has been settled.
I’ve come to the conclusion the only thing you can really do is leave when you disagree with the direction of your country, but of course not everyone has the ability to do that.
If they can't be arsed to answer you, then you shouldn't be arsed to vote for them, at least in my opinion.
You can also recreate a smaller network and enjoy it as a silo, disconnected from the Internet, at times.
There's no need to be off the grid 24/7 to feel the relief.
It's deeply relaxing to pull the (Internet) plug (I do, literally, physically remove one ethernet cable from a switch right underneath my monitor and I've then got several machines happily communicating only on the LAN: no more Internet).
Maybe I'm having fun with my latest acquisition: modelling parts to fix stuff left and right around the house by 3D printing them (I bought a 3D printer for that: I had many things I needed to fix and I knew I'd be able to fix them properly by printing adequate parts). No need for the Internet to model, slice and 3D print.
Such an activity does feel like the computing of yore: it takes me back to a time when it was me and a 8-bit machine. Creating stuff "by code" (which now take physical form at home, which 11-years old me would have find utterly mindboggling btw).
> There are other things to do. Many books to read and places to go.
And hobbies. As a kid from the eighties I love cars from the late 80s/very early 90s: not much electronics, not spying on you. Sure they're a bit of gaz guzzlers but then half the fun is fixing stuff on them and the other half is talking about them with other enthusiasts: there's no need to drive 10 000 kilometers a year with those.
When you take time to disconnect a bit from the Internet, then I'd say when you're online (like I'm now) it all feels way more tolerable.
No need to go full luddite IMO but YMMV.
I wrap the outbound sock5 traffic in mTLS, so it should look "normal" to anyone packet sniffing (not obvious proxy/VPN traffic), even though stealthiness isn't part of the threat model at the moment.
-- John Gilmore (probably https://quoteinvestigator.com/2021/07/12/censor/)
If the government blocks Mullvad then I’ll just switch to Wireguard on a Helsinki based VPS via Hetzner.
VPNs are trivial to ban, the IP space is well known, Wireguard is easily to fingerprint and block.
It will be a cat and mouse game, if the government looses this they'll simply make it illegal to be caught using a VPN including Tor. Which is on the table.
The only way this changes is a less crap party, but almost all including Reform are in favour of more censorship.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jul/28/reform-uk-v...
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/reform-pledges-to-scra...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nigel-farage...
Zia Yusuf : "... criticised sections of the legislation that allow ministers to direct regulator Ofcom to modify its rules setting out how companies can comply with requirements to crack down on illegal or harmful content, saying it was “the sort of thing that I think (Chinese president) Xi Jinping himself would blush at the concept of”."
And the more radical Restore say this:
https://www.restorebritain.org.uk/restore_civil_liberties
I've felt this slide in the UK for a long period of time. I route _all_ of my traffic through Mullvad with DAITA [1] because I think it's the only the likes of chaffing and winnowing [2] that can defeat traffic analysis. The endpoint changes. I have a high-end SBC router. For the moment, I do not obsfucate the fact that the tunnels exist and are wireguard. Mullvad can disguise them effectively with QUIC / SNI obsfucation, or even vless / xray / vmess. They're quite good at that.
I also have an Amsterdam VPS and it runs wireguard. My phone has a wireguard client to it. It's a reputable VPS provider from a major cloud hosting company. It has a reverse WG tunnel to my house not through mullvad (I have a public IPv6 address range, but not IPv4); my phone (and partner, friends etc phones) get access to my local servers and resources and then all traffic goes out anonymously through mullvad. I also have another VPS, paid for in cryptocurrency (XMR) that I mine in the winter (the waste heat is cheaper than gas heating where I live, if you assume the compute is paid for...). This acts as a port forwarding host and it connects via another WG tunnel or two to my server, doing tunnel-in-tunnel, but essentially is a reverse proxy host.
I naturally run a recursive resolver _and_ dnscrypt on the ISP connection for bootstrapping.
This gives me _some_ degree of anonymity, I feel, online: I've inspected the traffic going through the ISP router and you see remarkably little, especially with QUIC SNI spoofing turned on. The volume of traffic is quite large and probably idiosyncratic – the endpoints are known – which is the biggest problem amongst all of this. But I have _privacy_ and for me that matters a lot.
I think this age verification, KYC, show your faces stuff is organised internationally on two very simple predicates:
1) Disinformation or political interference provided by Russia and possibly China have affected national election results in many democracies (Brexit, likely Trump, probably more). Controlling the narrative is increasingly viewed as absolutely required by the political class. This is difficult with social media, and strong identity verification makes it more obvious where at least your enemies are.
2) Online actions are increasingly having real world consequences and the establishment wants to be able to more easily _punish_ those people who have broken "the law". This is related to, but distinct from, point 1. There are plenty of examples of this in the UK – but more widely spread worldwide. Having strong identity verification makes it easy to catch people, and if you do that enough, change behaviour (the single biggest determinant of which is shortening the time between "offending" and being caught).
Minor points I think behind this are:
1) A fear of a large-scale war and worries about information security, population influence, and associated military shadowy figures saying things
2) A fear (or fact) of encryption making any sort of content dragnet much harder. Most large web presences undoubtedly have backdoors but genuine p2p without exposed metadata is a fear of the spook community because they kill people on the basis of metadata and machine learning state-of-the-art...as it was in 2014 [3] -- I am sure they do the same now. The reason for metadata is that it is accessible, by design, everywhere. VPN ± tor usage is probably ubiquitous amongst some genuinely bad actors, and they will have spent considerable resources being able to unmask those actors. Depending on the technique, it may genuinely make it much harder if there is a large fraction of the population actually using those tools.
3) Some genuine transnational rise in avoidable harm, like CSAM; some genuine transnational rise in political harms, like the (oft-religious) right.
[1] https://mullvad.net/en/vpn/daita [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaffing_and_winnowing [3] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/02/the-n...
Good luck, it will probably impossible as admins fed up with AI scraper bots increasingly choose to outright blanket ban anything not being a residential or business line. There's a reason why there are so many "ethically sourced proxies" aka people installing software on their smart TVs and whatnot that comes with an "monetization SDK" by one of the numerous VPN providers. That's the dirty secret behind a lot of the "bypass youtube/netflix/whatever region lock" VPNs.
The current UK government don't actually care about children, if they did then they would actually investigate the child SA gangs, or holding people to account on the Epstein lists. We have seen other countries such as Australia [1] "magically" have the same idea at the same time, so this is likely a global group influencing this push.
> The current proposal to ban people under 16 - who also have the rights to freedom of expression and privacy - from some (as yet not fully delineated) social media services is likely to result in wide-spread verification.
This is the real objective, it will be just like the UK porn verification [2]. To express yourself online, you will soon need to associate your activity with your real identity. With the discussion of clamping down on VPNs, it won't be long before you need to verify your ID just to connect to the internet.
This has been a long time coming. Years ago you could buy a sim card with money already on it, use it, and then throw it away. Now you need to associate some credit card or ID with the sim card and perform some verification process.
> And so, for the first time, I am considering locating something (perhaps a WireGuard node, or a SOCKS proxy, or a recursive DNS server / DNS proxy, or perhaps all of them) somewhere on the Internet outside the UK, so that I can route some traffic through that, as needed, to maintain my access to the web.
It won't be enough. At some point the UK government will just mandate that they should be allowed to perform deep packet inspection, and then there will be nowhere left to hide. These changes are also being rolled out everywhere - which Country do you trust to run your data through?
I remember the New Zealand Christchurch attack on a mosque, and how multiple governments around the world pressured Facebook to remove it entirely [3]. They were more worried about people seeing and sharing the attack, than the attack itself. The manifesto was entirely banned [4], and people were left entirely dependent on the state to convey a narrative about the attack.
I have a feeling that this all fell out of the "Christchurch Call" [5]. I don't think this recent push spearheaded by them, but I believe it had a large influence on the efforts now ongoing.
[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyp9d3ddqyo
[2] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/a...
[3] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47620519
[4] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/24/censor-bans-ma...
[5] https://www.christchurchcall.org/
I've seen and experienced all manner of things the state would deem verboten, especially for younger eyes, whether it be the anarchists cookbook sparking my enthusiasm for chemistry and engineering, warez igniting my love of software development or the inescapable porn, memes, and other shit that's filled my screen for decade after decade. I've managed to make it through unscathed, dare I say even somewhat publicly respectable... I'd vote for my kids and any others having my childhood over the toxic stazi-esque nightmare we seem to currently find ourselves in. I LOVED my childhood growing up with the internet, CD-R's, Napster, etc. it inspired me & helped create the life I live today, but now all the kids using tech just look like methed out zombies.
It's also really funny reflecting on this & realising how very little I ever used or valued anything like Facebook, Instagram, etc. whereas things like BBS's, IRC, Discord, Telegram, etc. with random strangers and some shared interests is where I've always felt at home.
"who also have the rights to freedom of expression and privacy", plenty of outlets for people to be expressive in the UK (more so than in the US for example, where the right wing will obviously attack any social media restrictions) that don't involve being fed junk divisive content from mainly US tech companies.
Privacy != anonymity.
Feel free to route your traffic via Wireguard. As long as it is not setup as a service for the mass evasion of age gates by children.
Exactly. You can have your own misgivings about the UK government at home, in private, and share them with no-one. Or you can share them on the online public square, knowing the UK government will know exactly who wrote them. Good thing they never abuse their power of prosecution!
It is done by the CPS, which operates independently of government and the police.
If I were a betting man I'd place a bet that you are further misinformed about the prosecutions you believe are happening and why. But I am not.
I should have written "state", not "government", you're right. Does that change anything? But, article 35 of the Chinese constitution guarantees their citizens freedom of speech and of the press. You're beyond naive if you believe they're independent.
> If I were a betting man I'd place a bet that you are further misinformed about the prosecutions you believe are happening and why.
UK politicians admitted the Online Safety Act was: “not primarily aimed at … the protection of children”, but was about regulating “services that have a significant influence over public discourse” - https://archive.md/2025.08.13-190800/https://www.thetimes.co...
Even viewing "terrorist" material carries a potential 15 YEAR jail term: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41479620
It's OK to be white and similar stickers landed a man in jail: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51zn2l33r9o
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/04/the-tyrannical-jail...
I don't know how much worse you need it to be.
In practice, if you lose one, then you also lose the other.