10 comments

  • childofhedgehog 7 minutes ago
    I had visited to see the cherry blossoms in 2017 and felt that we were going too early but actually made it for the peak. It’s scary how quickly the dates are shifting. I wonder what impact the earlier blooms have on the trees over the coming years, as this does not seem to be natural.
  • binarymax 58 minutes ago
    We have a cherry blossom tree. It bloomed a week earlier than last year. We’re not in Kyoto but I did notice and it’s a bit strange. I also noticed some other blossoming trees that typically bloom for about a week, went green after 3 days.
    • lysace 43 minutes ago
      Anecdotes like that with a 1 year horizon.. that's what we call weather.

      A 1200 year time series.. that's climate.

      Much shorter periods can of course also be considered as such. I suppose exactly how short is subject to some debate.

      • billfor 14 minutes ago
        If you go back a few million, that's also climate. We're still in an ice age. https://www.climate.gov/media/16817
      • BobbyJo 29 minutes ago
        Weather can be due to climate, and time series are composed of anecdotes.
        • lysace 26 minutes ago
          Key words: can be

          Longer time series are indeed composed of many samples/anecdotes.

      • sandworm101 11 minutes ago
        Climate is also dimensional. Kyoto is a point. A point over time is a line, a line through a 3d set of data. That a single point is seeing an effect is interesting but not as significant as widespread changes. Only when multiple measurements create a 2d map of realtime data, which becomes a 3d bulk over time, should we draw conclusions. Sadly, that is also happening. But the later should be the topic of conversation, not a single very visible data point.
  • Sparkyte 43 minutes ago
    Trees often bloom based on the surrounding climate and conidtions. Warmer bursts in early spring lead to early blossoms.
  • cf100clunk 57 minutes ago
  • yeah879846 16 minutes ago
    Now this is climate science I can get behind.
  • lysace 49 minutes ago
  • LightBug1 21 minutes ago
    Really disappointing first parse of the comments.

    My average comment quality is pretty terrible, but these are on par.

  • ndisn 11 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • andrewstuart 28 minutes ago
    If you’re not terrified by this then you haven’t thought through the implications.
  • carabiner 42 minutes ago
    Many factors in this. Heat islands from urbanization in Kyoto, different species bred for earlier blooming, etc.
    • nharada 41 minutes ago
      Is the "etc" here "because of human greenhouse emissions, the earth is rapidly warming"?
    • henry2023 10 minutes ago
      If these events where random noise then they would distribute in both sides of the climate models; We don’t observe that. Events only seem to match or be worse than expectations.
    • Psillisp 5 minutes ago
      lo heat, why doth thou radiate? from your islands; blooming species differently...